Shp9500 vs shp9600

I know it's not apples to apples because the SHP9500 and SHP9600s are different headphones, but as someone with both M50X's and SHP9600's I gotta disagree with you mate. The ships are significantly worse built than the M50X's as they feel kinda creaky, clacky, and thin (definitely cheap but are paradoxically quite rugged), but sound …

Also Im having a problem with my music because its kinda low or weak so idk if its on the shp9500 or my realtek drivers. tried to uninstall reinstall the drivers but it still the same. Can't hear the minimal sound/volume when watching youtube and playing video game like Escape from tarkov which really bothers me.They also feature a practical design with a double-layered headband and mesh ear cups for optimum comfort and breathability. A significant difference between these two headsets is that the Philips Fidelio X2HR comes with a 3m cable, while the SHP 9500 has a 1.5m cable for connectivity purposes. In addition, the SHP 9500 features large 'L ...#PhilipsSHP9500 #Openback #HeadphonesMy first open back headphonesThe SHP9500 honestly measures reasonably well and there's almost no competition for open-back headphones in its price bracket. It's compatible with the V-Moda boom mic, has a decent set of features for the price point, and is readily available. It's probably still the open back king under $75.Cymbals and drums sound great; pianos and plucked strings sound phenomenal. The transient response is also quick. The Philips SHP9500 Headphones comprise 50 mm drivers. The acoustic, open-back design removes air-pressure build-up on the backside of the driver and provides the diaphragm with ample space for movement.The Sundara will give you better midrange resolution and deeper bass extension (I owned a pair) compared to the SHP9600. They're really a solid headphone for $500, and a no brainier for the $350 I paid. I ultimately returned them to fund another purchase, but I really miss them. I also own the HD 650 and found the Sundara a great compliment to ...The cups of the SHP9500 and the 6xx trap some of that audio that is supposed to bounce off. For me, I think that the trapped sound was fatiguing my ears in some way. I tested this by cupping my ears with the KSC75 on and I could hear all …SHP9600 vs X2HR. Headphones - Open Back. the yet to be released SHP9600 sells for 129$ and the X2HR sells for 144$ which one is is a better deal. ... But if it's anything like the SHP9500, the X2HR is gonna have more low end than it. 2. Share. Report Save. level 2. Op · 1y.

The Beyerdynamic DT 990 PRO and the Philips SHP9500 are both very good audiophile headphones if you like a neutral sound, but they have different sound profiles. The Beyerdynamic reproduce more bass, but they sound fairly sharp and even piercing to some people. The Philips have a significant bass roll-off, but their treble is much better …SHP9500 and SHP9600 are nothing alike aside from sharing a parent driver, most likely. Soundstage has no bearing on the actual sound quality, though I will admit the SHP9500 can be partially fixed with EQ (transient hole) unlike M50X which always has that shrill treble timbre.SHP9500 vs Sennheiser HD559. Thread starter angelmf2704; Start date Jul 22, 2021; Tags open back philips sennheiser Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar. Forums. Audio. Hi-Fi. Headphones, etc. . angelmf2704 Well-known member. Nov 15, 2020 96 16 545. Jul 22, 2021 #1 Hello, I'm would like to buy a new pair of headphones. ...The SHP9500's are neutral, and so are the HD 560s. If I'm not mistaken the X2HR's are V-shaped and I don't have any HP's using that sound signature yet. I've heard mixed thoughts about the comfort levels between the X2HR and the SHP9500 but I'd consider the SHP9500 to be more comfortable than the HD 560S which says a lot considering how ...Hi all, I just got my hands on the SHP9600 and I noticed there aren't a lot of impressions out there. Obligatory "I'm no audiophile" lol but here are my impressions after about an hour of listening. Well, first let's talk about the packaging, build and comfort briefly. The packaging is very minimal, you get the headphones, cable and 1/4 adapter.While the X2HR have an auto-adjusting headband, the SHP9500 are a little bit more comfortable overall as they don't clamp the head as tightly. Both perform very similarly, but the SHP9500 likely represent better value overall. ... The Philips Fidelio X2HR are better headphones for neutral sound than the Philips SHP9600.---- Featured: ----- SHP9600 (w/mic combo ON SALE for $99): https://amzn.to/2KRg9cd- SHP9500 (Amazon, standalone): https://amzn.to/2WOQSSN- Fidelio X2HR (w/m...Features. The most significant difference is in the frequency response. The model Philips SHP9500 has a range of 12 Hz - 35 kHz, while in the case with Audio-Technica ATH-AD700X it is 5 Hz - 30 kHz. Speaking of sensitivity, this feature is almost the same, as the Philips device has 101 dB and the one made by Audio-Technica has 100 dB.

SHP9600 vs SHP9500 for gaming & music . As the title says, I want to get a headset for gaming and music, priority more for gaming than music. Which one is better? Please help, as I need to make a purchase today, ASAP. ... HE1000 Stealth vs HD800S vs LCD-X vs Focal Clear Mg.5 Okt 2020 ... Similarly, mids and highs have enough presence and clarity for our ears, but compared to the SHP9500 you might notice a bit of roll-off that ...Philips. philips headset original. philips flagship store. sennheiser headphones. headset gaming for pc. philips fidelio x2hr. All new Philips SHP9600 with the perfect blend of performance, comfort, and quality. Open-back design with spacious sound. Ideal for listening to your favorite music everyday at home. Perfectly tuned 50 mm drivers deliver crisp bass, balanced midrange, and prstine high ...The first drawback of Philips SHP9500 vs Fidelio X2HR is a tighter range of frequency response, 12Hz-35KHz vs 5Hz-40KHz. The sensitivity and impedance of the headphones is almost equal with 32 vs 30 Ohm and 101 vs 100 dB. Sound. The bass of Philips SHP9500 is boomy, but seems inconsistent, and lacks sub-bass.Phillips with vmoda mic will be much better. 8. gregthorntree • 2 yr. ago. Studio Headphones like the Phillips tend to be better sound, but you might need an amp/dac for them like the SoundBlasterX G6. Same thing with the mic, it's gonna be better than using the internal on the Arctic. Arctic 7P may have easier and better features since it ...I just kinda take bits of relevant info from reviews and suggest stuff from what I've heard. However, I've heard that the HD559 is much more smoother on the bass than the SHP9500 (which is said to have a "grainy" texture according to some reviewers). Also the HD559 isn't as sibilant (piercing "s" sound) as the SHP9500 which is kinda harsh at times.

Inmate penpal free.

Photo taken by the author. T he Philips SHP9600 is the long-awaited followup to the SHP9500, a model that I and many others heralded many years ago as an excellent choice for both its performance and incredible value.. This new model fixes the small problems the original had…but that comes alongside a significant price increase. …samson sr850 vs philips shp9500 . I'm getting into critical listening. I used to use my pair of regular earbuds that come with my iphone se, they're alright but I want to take the step forward. I listen to a lot of music, rarely gaming or content watching. After reading some reviews, I was going for the grado sr60e but I can't seem to ...SHP9500 - https://amzn.to/2McolnDHD58X - https://massdrop.7eer.net/vmYeNEbay listings for HD558 - https://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_from=R40&_trksid=p2334524....5 Okt 2020 ... Similarly, mids and highs have enough presence and clarity for our ears, but compared to the SHP9500 you might notice a bit of roll-off that ...Philips Shp9500 vs x2hr, the price of shp9500 is more reasonable. The price of SHP to the features it comes with is quite affordable. If you are on a budget these headphones are the ones you need. You’ll get excellent performance in the arena of music and comfort. Fidelio X2hr in comparison to SHP9500 is overpriced.

for SHP9500: https://misodiko.com/collections/upgraded-series-shp9500for SHP9600: https://misodiko.com/collections/upgraded-series-philips-shp9600-----------...The SHP9500 still has that Philips signature sound. It's well balanced and a different approach to X1. The X1 is unique how open back headphones can sound so warm and bassy which appeal many people. The SHP9500 seems like developed from another Philips team with different approach and philosophy, and build on the concept of SHP9000.Used HD 600 vs New HD 6XX - Mixing, General Listening. r/HeadphoneAdvice ... shp9500 vs shp9600 for gaming. r/HeadphoneAdvice ...The new SHP9600! The successor to the VERY POPULAR SHP9500 headphones. Legendary budget headphones! The Philips SHP9600 are looking to replace the budget aud...Philips SHP9500 vs CoolerMaster MH751 vs Superlux HD681 EVO . ... TLDR: if you're worried about the harshness of the 9500 and want some decent bass, the SHP9600 is a good option as long as it's around $90 USD or less. It originally launched at an abysmal $130 but it thankfully reduced.Go for hd 560s. That's the best you can get now under 20k. It undercuts many higher tier headphones in several areas. Also buy an amp to drive these headphones. the hd 599se and shp9500 both are available at 7-8k and unfortunately thats the limit of my budget too as this is my first purchase with my own money. S.Sep 12, 2020 · #philipsshp9500vs9600That Good Good👇👇👇I hope you enjoyed this Philips SHP9500 vs. 9600 Comparison, and came away with some valuable insight. Questions? Co... PHILIPS SHP9600 / SHP 9600 Hi-Fi Open Back Stereo Over Ear Headphones · 1.599.000 ; Earcup Ear Pads Earpad Philips SHP9500 SHP9600 SHP 9500 9600 Headset Foam.

Phillips with vmoda mic will be much better. 8. gregthorntree • 2 yr. ago. Studio Headphones like the Phillips tend to be better sound, but you might need an amp/dac for them like the SoundBlasterX G6. Same thing with the mic, it's gonna be better than using the internal on the Arctic. Arctic 7P may have easier and better features since it ...

Tai nghe Philips SHP9500. Tai nghe Philips SHP9500 Là dòng tai nghe HiFi stereo headphones cao cấp mang đến dừng dải âm thanh tinh khiết, chân thật, đáp ứng được nhiều dòng nhạc khó tính. Đáp ứng được tần số từ 12-35kHz cùng với độ nhậy lên tới 101dB. Sở hữu màng loa lớn 50mm với kết cấu nam chân vĩnh cửu neodynium mang ...No, you more than likely will not be blown away by the HD560S in terms of sound quality. You might however prefer the comfort and build quality. Also, without EQ the HD560S absolutely should sound a lot better than the SHP9500. Stock SHP9500 tuning is absolute ass if you ask me due to that spike at 6kHz and the heavy sub-bass roll-off.#philipsshp9500vs9600That Good Good👇👇👇I hope you enjoyed this Philips SHP9500 vs. 9600 Comparison, and came away with some valuable insight. Questions? Co...sound pressure level. 100dB/mW. 101dB/mW. Devices with a higher sound pressure level are generally louder when supplied with any given audio source. has a neodymium magnet. Philips Fidelio X2. Philips SHP9600. Devices with neodymium magnets are lighter and more powerful than those which use ferrite magnets.Philips（หูฟัง） SHP9500 Wired Headset Tri-Band Balanced HIFI Sound Quality Open Gaming Headset（หูฟังเกม） Online Class Headphone 4.8 120At that time, I almost returned the SHP9500 because I didn't really hear any improvement, but the SHP9500 stayed on my head for the comfort and fit. Even after going to a head-fi meet with my two cans at the time, the K553 and SHP9500, I felt the short time I had with some of the TOTL headphones(HE1000, HD800/S, HD600/650, etc) was totally not ...Shp9500 vs dt770 pro ! I have both. They have their own use. SHP9500 is open back which mean you can hear everything around you, it also has a flat sound signiture, bass is there but it doesn't thump, sound stage is pretty good too. Dt770 Pro is a closed back headphones. If you wear it properly, it can block out noises around you.About Press Copyright Contact us Creators Advertise Developers Terms Privacy Policy & Safety How YouTube works Test new features NFL Sunday Ticket Press Copyright ...

Bucknell acceptance rate 2022.

Costco pharmacy easton.

The SHP9500 has grain in the mid-treble transition that isn't present on the HD 598. The HD 598 is more tonally balanced. Both have recessed mid- and sub-bass, but the HD 598 is less recessed. The treble of the SHP9500 is slightly more extended than the HD 598. Overall, the HD 598 sounds better to me.Philips SHP9500 . The set is an absolute steal for the brand towards the lower end of the price range. Philips SHP 9500s. You are looking at a more expensive set than the SHP 9500 but still, right in the middle of average. The Winner Is- The Philips SHP 9500. Read next – Cowin e7 vs e7 Pro: Which Noise Cancelling Headphone is Better?I entered the hobby 6 years ago, and while scaling in cost of products from shp9500's into the multi thousands dollar cans I have learned a few things. You will be impressed by headphones like the shp9500, ath m40x's and so on If you haven't heard better like I hadn't. Shp9500's with boom pro is great for 100 dollars, emphasis on 100 dollars.At that time, I almost returned the SHP9500 because I didn't really hear any improvement, but the SHP9500 stayed on my head for the comfort and fit. Even after going to a head-fi meet with my two cans at the time, the K553 and SHP9500, I felt the short time I had with some of the TOTL headphones(HE1000, HD800/S, HD600/650, etc) was totally not ...Philips SHP9500 vs SHP9600 at similar price. I'm in the market for a headset that is comfortable for my big head. I've been looking around and found people recommend the SHP9500/9600 for people with large heads that are also looking for good enough sound quality under $100. They're both right around $65 right now on Amazon in the US, so ...Well one is an Open Back the other is a Closed Back. The biggest glaring difference is going to be Bass Response, and this goes to the M50X. The SHP's are open backs so naturally will have quite a bit of Low end roll off, they'll also leak sound out to the environment, so are only good for Home use.The device comes with its own special case or pouch, which is useful for safe transportation. has an open-back design. Beyerdynamic DT 770 PRO. Philips SHP9500S. The device is designed in a way that allows sound to go out through the back of the ear cups, which usually have vents or perforations.Shp9600 vs shp9500 I have the shp9500 for a while and now the shp9600 is on sale for $69 Btw on my country I need to pay 20% import fees for orders from $75 and aboveThe instruments all sound jumbled together and in some tracks, even the vocalists is thrown into the mess. However, in tamer and more calm songs, the separation is quite good, especially in well-mastered songs and albums. Build quality is good to me. Feels sturdy and is stupidly light. I barely feel them on my head.The Sennheiser HD 550 headset is a better model because 6dB/mW higher sound pressure level & comes with a 1.5m longer cable. The Philips SHP9500 headset is the ideal unit because it comes with 8Hz lower low-frequency, 9000Hz higher high-frequency, and comes with a neodymium magnet.Devices with a higher sound pressure level are generally louder when supplied with any given audio source. has a neodymium magnet. Philips Fidelio X1. Philips SHP9600. Devices with neodymium magnets are lighter and more powerful than those which use ferrite magnets. They also have more bass and clear high notes. ….

This item: Philips Audio SHP9600 Wired, Over-Ear, Headphones, Comfort Fit, Open-Back 50 mm Neodymium Drivers (SHP9600/00) - Black, 50mm Drivers Open-Back $109.00 $ 109 . 00 Get it by Thursday, Oct 12Both have a degree of rolloff which is common with open-back headphones. The HD600 has a very slight edge here as the bass is noticeably cleaner (decays faster) than the SHP9500. This is something you really have to listen for but its there on some tracks. The HD600 thumps quick and is gone when its needed.Sennheiser HD599 vs Philips SHP9500 . i wanted a pair of hd 599's until i came across shp9500 and going by the reviews they seem amazing. ... For rock and edm music go with the SHP9600. It's on sale for $100 on amazon and comes with a mic.The Philips SHP9500 is absolutely legendary, as it offers a tremendous value and has great utility. Today we re-visit the SHP9500 build, measured frequency ...The Beyerdynamic DT 990 PRO and the Philips SHP9500 are both very good audiophile headphones if you like a neutral sound, but they have different sound profiles. The Beyerdynamic reproduce more bass, but they sound fairly sharp and even piercing to some people. The Philips have a significant bass roll-off, but their treble is much better balanced, and they have a more natural-seeming soundstage.SHP9600/00. Overall Rating / 5. Reviews Reviews-{discount-value} Images ; Over ear headphones SHP9600/00. Overall Rating / 5. Reviews Reviews; A quality performance. Looking for the perfect blend of performance, comfort, and quality? These over-ear, open-back headphones are built to take your home listening up a notch.Comparing Philips SHP9600 vs Sennheiser HD 560s . Print Email . Philips SHP9600 Over-Ear Open-Back Headphones . You Pay: $99.99 (1) Add to Cart View Cart. Add to Wish List Item in Wish List . Create new. Sennheiser HD 560S High-Performance Headphones . You Pay: $175.00 (15) Add to Cart View Cart. Add to Wish List Item in Wish List .AutoEQ generates a harman target from the measurements they get. All of the EQ's I inserted are following a harman target. Sonarworks is pretty close, I've compared their bass vs an autoEQ in another headphone, the q701 as well. So I've applied harman target EQ presets from u/oratory1990 vs AutoEQ from oratory and crinacle measurements.The Philips SHP9500 has a stylish and cool design that most of you would adore. The Philips Fidelio X2HR has an immersive sound quality with incredible lows, mids and highs. The sound that these headphones provide is well-balanced. Both headphones are wired and use a 1/8″ jack to connect with the other devices. Philips Fidelio X2HR Vs.Philips Shp9500 vs x2hr, the price of shp9500 is more reasonable. The price of SHP to the features it comes with is quite affordable. If you are on a budget these headphones are the ones you need. You’ll get excellent performance in the arena of music and comfort. Fidelio X2hr in comparison to SHP9500 is overpriced. Shp9500 vs shp9600, In the case with the headphones by Audio-Technica ATH-M40x, it is 15 Hz - 24 kHz. Meanwhile, the ones made by Philips have a range of 12 Hz - 35 kHz. The sensitivity is rather similar. Audio-Technica ATH-M40x vs Philips SHP9500 has 98 dB, while the other appliance has 101 dB. In addition, the first pair of headphones have 30 …, I would like to get Philips SHP9500, but I've been comparing and the bass accuracy is getting a 7.0, while every other pair gets a 7.6 to an 8. Of course the overall sound is great for the Phillips, but I don't want to get them and be disappointed by the bass, but I also don't want to get a pair that is muddy in every other category besides bass., sound pressure level. 100dB/mW. 101dB/mW. Devices with a higher sound pressure level are generally louder when supplied with any given audio source. has a neodymium magnet. Philips Fidelio X2. Philips SHP9600. Devices with neodymium magnets are lighter and more powerful than those which use ferrite magnets., #philipsshp9500vs9600That Good Good👇👇👇I hope you enjoyed this Philips SHP9500 vs. 9600 Comparison, and came away with some valuable insight. Questions? Co..., 105dB/mW. 101dB/mW. Devices with a higher sound pressure level are generally louder when supplied with any given audio source. has a neodymium magnet. Philips Fidelio L2. Philips SHP9600. Devices with neodymium magnets are lighter and more powerful than those which use ferrite magnets., The Philips SHP9500 are better for neutral sound than the Samson SR850. The Philips are open-back headphones with a much more comfortable and breathable fit. They have a much more accurate treble response and a more neutral sound profile that some may prefer. They're also much more comfortable and breathable. On the other hand, while the Samson may sound overly bright to some, they also ..., GamesRadar+ Verdict A solid pair of headphones, but not worth the price tag when you can get the SHP9500 for so much cheaper. Pros + Comfy and light + Decent bass + Well built Cons - Minor..., sound pressure level. 100dB/mW. 101dB/mW. Devices with a higher sound pressure level are generally louder when supplied with any given audio source. has a neodymium magnet. Philips Fidelio X2. Philips SHP9600. Devices with neodymium magnets are lighter and more powerful than those which use ferrite magnets., Philips SHP 9500 vs SHP 9600 budget headphones for beginners . Right now I'm torn between the 9500 and 9600, I've never owned or used an open back headphone before and am contemplating getting one of these two. The 9500 is currently priced at 62$ where I live, and the 9600 at 82$, 20$ difference. ... Upgrading from Philips SHP9500, need advice., Audio-Technica ATH-M50xPhilips SHP9500S. The Ath m50x does a good job in delivering the flat sound but lacks a bit in bass and high end curve is a bit too steep.The comfort level decreases after prolonged use and thus that impacts your listening ability.Other than that it is a good value for money buy., Philips SHP9500 and its open-back, over-ear design is comfortable for long-term wear and has low impedance so that it will work great with and without headphone amplifiers, allowing you to enjoy greater sound transparency and smooth high frequencies. High precision sound. 50mm drivers/open-back. Over-ear., Philips SHP9500 and its open-back, over-ear design is comfortable for long-term wear and has low impedance so that it will work great with and without headphone amplifiers, allowing you to enjoy greater sound transparency and smooth high frequencies. High precision sound. 50mm drivers/open-back. Over-ear., I was eyeing the SHP9500 mostly for doing simple post-processing and EQing voiceover recordings, casual music listening and video watching, and FPS gaming where sound sources do help in the experience. If the SHP9500 is just enough for my needs I might get it but if the X2HR's performance justifies the price gap, might go for that one instead., Most definitely the SHP9500. I have the AD900X's and I still prefer the Philips due to their oomph in the lower end and they still aren't too harsh up top, vaguely speaking. Both are extremely easy to drive. I also modded my SHP9500's with some HM5 pads which took a while but you can do it if you want (highly recommended). Unless you're playing ..., The HiFiMan Edition XS are the best mid-range audiophile headphones we've tested. These over-ears are easier on the wallet than the Sennheiser HD 800 S and still have planar magnetic transducers to help boost their bass and create an immersive sound. While they aren't as comfortable or well-built, they have a neutral sound profile with a flat mid-range, so vocals and lead instruments sound ..., 100dB/mW. 101dB/mW. Devices with a higher sound pressure level are generally louder when supplied with any given audio source. has a neodymium magnet. Philips Fidelio X3. Philips SHP9600. Devices with neodymium magnets are lighter and more powerful than those which use ferrite magnets., rhalf • 139 Ω • 4 mo. ago. SHP9600 has a popular V-shape sound. 9500 is a neutral-bright. 9600 has big bass so I guess it's easier to like. KenBalbari • 76 Ω • 4 mo. ago. Depends mostly on your preference. The 9500 has more treble. The 9600 has more bass, less treble. I prefer the 9600. Moisture0101 • 4 mo. ago., Compare Philips SHP9500 vs Philips Fidelio X2HR Side-by-Side Comparison Products Philips SHP9500 Philips Fidelio X2HR Tested using Methodology v1.5 Updated …, EQ setting for Philips SHP9500 Preamp gain:-8,0 dB-20-10 0 10 20 30 10 100 1€000 10€000] Frequency [Hz] SPL Frequency Response with EQ Harman AE/OE 2018 Target Raw Frequency Response Compensated Frequency Response f1 60 Hz f2 200 Hz f3 1200 Hz f4 2200 Hz f5 3000 Hz f6 4500 Hz f7 4850 Hz f8 5700 Hz f9 6250 Hz f10 13000 Hz-20-10 0 10 20, Most definitely the SHP9500. I have the AD900X's and I still prefer the Philips due to their oomph in the lower end and they still aren't too harsh up top, vaguely speaking. Both are extremely easy to drive. I also modded my SHP9500's with some HM5 pads which took a while but you can do it if you want (highly recommended)., 106dB/mW. 102dB/mW. Devices with a higher sound pressure level are generally louder when supplied with any given audio source. has a neodymium magnet. Philips Fidelio M1. Philips SHP9500S. Devices with neodymium magnets are lighter and more powerful than those which use ferrite magnets., The HD600’s bass in comparison resembles more of a bass head sound, but that’s only with the 9500 as a buffer. You’ll notice more thump and less of a needle-like precision. I would say the 9500’s bass is more textured and lean, while the HD600’s is warmer with a bit of extra fat. Winner: HD600 by a slight edge., clouds core is shit sounding,shp9500 is good for gaming but weak music,podcast,singleplayer voice actors performance its tonality is to artificial,grainy sounding id recommend akg k361/sen hd559 with standalone mic or if you want allinone plugin package coolermaster mh751 has great mic and decent overall sound better tonality than shp9500 with excellent comfort., The SHP9500 appear to lack bass and sub bass. Will an EQ or amplifier help bring in a little more or will the bass be what it is no matter what? All the demos of the DT990 and DT770 (that I trust) are 250 Ohm. Would the 80 Ohm sacrifice high end detail/clarity? ... EQ for the SHP9600., muhwyndhp • 2 yr. ago. SHP9600 in my opinion is a clear downgrade from AKG K361. I owned SHP9500 and has been running it with flat EQ for a while and when I got my AKG K361 my SHP were almost completely sidelined. Knowing that SHP9600 is just some retuned version of SHP9500 I won't be surprised if you're disappointed., I have had both the 9500 and 9600 and like them both for what they do. The 9500 is more neutral compared to the 9600, thats why most say its the best starter for gaming. The 9600 is more warm compared to the 9500 (which I enjoy) both are great for music and games and I also had the X2HR. I found them to be heavy for long wares and very V shaped ..., The X2HR definitely has more bass and is better for music out of the box, but I found that I can increase the bass of the 9600 to a more enjoyable level for music with an amp with a bass knob. Also, the clamp force of the X2HR is a lot stronger than the 9600 and starts to make my head hurt after a while., I know it's not apples to apples because the SHP9500 and SHP9600s are different headphones, but as someone with both M50X's and SHP9600's I gotta disagree with you mate. The ships are significantly worse built than the M50X's as they feel kinda creaky, clacky, and thin (definitely cheap but are paradoxically quite rugged), but sound …, Philips SHP9500 . The set is an absolute steal for the brand towards the lower end of the price range. Philips SHP 9500s. You are looking at a more expensive set than the SHP 9500 but still, right in the middle of average. The Winner Is- The Philips SHP 9500. Read next - Cowin e7 vs e7 Pro: Which Noise Cancelling Headphone is Better?, sound pressure level. 98dB/mW. 102dB/mW. Devices with a higher sound pressure level are generally louder when supplied with any given audio source. has a neodymium magnet. Audio-Technica ATH-M40x. Philips SHP9500S. Devices with neodymium magnets are lighter and more powerful than those which use ferrite magnets., Alternatively I would go with the refreshed SHP9600 which is under your budget and "fixes" some of the issues with the 9500s if you wanted to keep it between the Philips and Hifiman. Amazon has them for $85 one-day shipping right now ... I've had both recently and like the SHP9500 much better. The 400se cable is so thin like fishing wire …, The best one you mention is the HD560s. HD599 is good but far behind the 560, and the SHP9600 would feel like a toy compared to the other 2. As for Amp, HD560 is 120 ohm i think, so maybe you can run it straight from your motherboard jack. Any amp would be able to give enough power to make them loud af., 100dB/mW. 101dB/mW. Devices with a higher sound pressure level are generally louder when supplied with any given audio source. has a neodymium magnet. Philips Fidelio X1. Philips SHP9600. Devices with neodymium magnets are lighter and more powerful than those which use ferrite magnets.